↓ Skip to main content

Digital vs. conventional workflow for one-abutment one-time immediate restoration in the esthetic zone: a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Implant Dentistry, February 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Digital vs. conventional workflow for one-abutment one-time immediate restoration in the esthetic zone: a randomized controlled trial
Published in
International Journal of Implant Dentistry, February 2022
DOI 10.1186/s40729-022-00406-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brieuc Hanozin, Lou Li Manni, Geoffrey Lecloux, Miljana Bacevic, France Lambert

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 4 27%
Student > Master 3 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Student > Postgraduate 1 7%
Unknown 5 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 40%
Unspecified 4 27%
Unknown 5 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2022.
All research outputs
#19,394,114
of 21,792,010 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Implant Dentistry
#72
of 99 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#277,150
of 340,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Implant Dentistry
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,792,010 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 99 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,487 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them