↓ Skip to main content

Development of the Hatagawa Fault Zone clarified by geological and geochronological studies

Overview of attention for article published in Earth Planets and Space, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Development of the Hatagawa Fault Zone clarified by geological and geochronological studies
Published in
Earth Planets and Space, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/bf03353308
Authors

Tomoaki Tomita, Tomoyuki Ohtani, Norio Shigematsu, Hidemi Tanaka, Koichiro Fujimoto, Yoji Kobayashi, Yukari Miyashita, Kentaro Omura

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 40%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 30%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 10%
Professor 1 10%
Unknown 1 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 90%
Unknown 1 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2021.
All research outputs
#7,053,430
of 21,712,946 outputs
Outputs from Earth Planets and Space
#367
of 1,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,525
of 339,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth Planets and Space
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,712,946 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,158 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,990 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them