↓ Skip to main content

Subsidies of Aquatic Resources in Terrestrial Ecosystems

Overview of attention for article published in Ecosystems, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
22 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
Title
Subsidies of Aquatic Resources in Terrestrial Ecosystems
Published in
Ecosystems, October 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10021-016-0050-7
Authors

Daniel E. Schindler, Adrianne P. Smits

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 105 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 20%
Student > Bachelor 20 19%
Student > Master 19 18%
Researcher 15 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 11 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 39%
Environmental Science 41 39%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 <1%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 <1%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 14 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2017.
All research outputs
#1,138,004
of 12,892,002 outputs
Outputs from Ecosystems
#118
of 799 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,162
of 287,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecosystems
#5
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,892,002 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 799 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.