Small-displacement linear surface ruptures of the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake sequence detected by ALOS-2 SAR interferometry
Earth, Planets and Space, September 2016
Satoshi Fujiwara, Hiroshi Yarai, Tomokazu Kobayashi, Yu Morishita, Takayuki Nakano, Basara Miyahara, Hiroyuki Nakai, Yuji Miura, Haruka Ueshiba, Yasuaki Kakiage, Hiroshi Une
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||40||93%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||7||19%|
|Student > Bachelor||5||14%|
|Professor > Associate Professor||5||14%|
|Student > Master||4||11%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Earth and Planetary Sciences||23||62%|
|Medicine and Dentistry||1||3%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2020.
All research outputs
of 24,970,913 outputs
Outputs from Earth, Planets and Space
of 1,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 330,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth, Planets and Space
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,970,913 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,423 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,100 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.