↓ Skip to main content

An HTML Tool for Production of Interactive Stereoscopic Compositions

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Systems, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
An HTML Tool for Production of Interactive Stereoscopic Compositions
Published in
Journal of Medical Systems, October 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10916-016-0616-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexey Chistyakov, Maria Teresa Soto, Enric Martí, Jordi Carrabina

Abstract

The benefits of stereoscopic vision in medical applications were appreciated and have been thoroughly studied for more than a century. The usage of the stereoscopic displays has a proven positive impact on performance in various medical tasks. At the same time the market of 3D-enabled technologies is blooming. New high resolution stereo cameras, TVs, projectors, monitors, and head mounted displays become available. This equipment, completed with a corresponding application program interface (API), could be relatively easy implemented in a system. Such complexes could open new possibilities for medical applications exploiting the stereoscopic depth. This work proposes a tool for production of interactive stereoscopic graphical user interfaces, which could represent a software layer for web-based medical systems facilitating the stereoscopic effect. Further the tool's operation mode and the results of the conducted subjective and objective performance tests will be exposed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 4%
Unknown 24 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Researcher 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 14 56%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 8%
Engineering 2 8%
Psychology 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 14 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2016.
All research outputs
#12,674,864
of 22,893,031 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Systems
#460
of 1,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,065
of 320,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Systems
#11
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,893,031 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,154 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,020 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.