↓ Skip to main content

Do Borders Really Slash Trade? A Meta-Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in IMF Economic Review, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Do Borders Really Slash Trade? A Meta-Analysis
Published in
IMF Economic Review, September 2016
DOI 10.1057/s41308-016-0001-5
Authors

Tomas Havranek, Zuzana Irsova

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 50%
Researcher 1 17%
Student > Bachelor 1 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 33%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 17%
Computer Science 1 17%
Social Sciences 1 17%
Engineering 1 17%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2016.
All research outputs
#2,119,131
of 8,529,445 outputs
Outputs from IMF Economic Review
#33
of 84 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,345
of 251,227 outputs
Outputs of similar age from IMF Economic Review
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,529,445 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 84 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,227 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.