| Title |
Do Borders Really Slash Trade? A Meta-Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
IMF Economic Review, September 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1057/s41308-016-0001-5 |
| Authors |
Tomas Havranek, Zuzana Irsova |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 64 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 19% |
| Researcher | 5 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 17% |
| Unknown | 13 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 26 | 41% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 8% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 5% |
| Engineering | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 15 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2023.
All research outputs
#2,534,908
of 25,727,480 outputs
Outputs from IMF Economic Review
#70
of 585 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,372
of 329,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from IMF Economic Review
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,727,480 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 585 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.