@NateErick This is good. https://t.co/TGgmX1aQTj I will have a special Talking Biotech podcast up this weekend featuring the story.
@CHandaxi @SantiagoTobon Articulo de 2016 sin estudios que lo abalen, en ciencia no importa el nombre o la organización, sino hay pruebas la opinión no sirve para nada, pero tranquilo aquí le dejo algo mas serio, ojala le sirvan. https://t.co/2dx0dDhkGZ ht
@Hiddemhigh Tja ..ik denk dat je de werken van @DeSchutterO al kent zeker? #glyfosaat. https://t.co/Kutm01BHb3
RT @CamiDRyan: Speaking of the health and well-being of animals, the study used: ✔️Too few rats to obtain statistically useful data ✔️the…
Speaking of the health and well-being of animals, the study used: ✔️Too few rats to obtain statistically useful data ✔️the rat strain was inappropriate ✔️authors inflicted unwarranted suffering through unethical treatment of study rats (See https://t.co/
@marcdraco63 @Timberati @zaruk have you seen this? https://t.co/GKCYhJBnic best critique I've seen @ProfParrott
@spiritstalker @kevinfolta @UgandaBIC repub w/o review; & why did this replication rebut it? https://t.co/bBREYBXl2Q and https://t.co/GKCYhJBnic or https://t.co/pJIkCMjgXe https://t.co/VQQNyB0aZ5
@12Bly @jasnoen @OysteinHeggdal Britt lyver. Mine kilder i kritikken av Seralini er Nature og Transgenic Research. Løhttp://t.co/BCElCC4ZIr
@kevinfolta I'm cornfused. Why would the Springer Group publish this in April, 2013 then re-publish Seralini? http://t.co/0nPmRp4njC
Now-retracted paper on GMOs had generated “tsunami” of scientific critique (see Letters at http://t.co/sEd33zsGyc & http://t.co/AETupNMtCi)
Now-retracted paper on GMOs had generated “tsunami” of scientific critique (see Letters at http://t.co/sEd33zsGyc & http://t.co/AETupNMtCi)
Now-retracted paper on GMOs had generated “tsunami” of scientific critique (see Letters at http://t.co/sEd33zsGyc & http://t.co/AETupNMtCi)
Now-retracted paper on GMOs had generated “tsunami” of scientific critique (see Letters at http://t.co/sEd33zsGyc & http://t.co/AETupNMtCi)
Now-retracted paper on GMOs had generated “tsunami” of scientific critique (see Letters at http://t.co/sEd33zsGyc & http://t.co/AETupNMtCi)
Now-retracted paper on GMOs had generated “tsunami” of scientific critique (see Letters at http://t.co/sEd33zsGyc & http://t.co/AETupNMtCi)
Now-retracted paper on GMOs had generated “tsunami” of scientific critique (see Letters at http://t.co/sEd33zsGyc & http://t.co/AETupNMtCi)
@calestous good piece, referring to this excellent critique from March http://t.co/RCL9OW3oqt worth endless RTs...
@RTFM_ @Astro_Pipe Este @GaboTuitero pasó el link del paper que indicaba que era un fraude el estudio http://t.co/RVyQCv9rJN
Paper on health concerns of #GMOs (http://t.co/sEd33zsGyc) generates “tsunami” of scientific critique (see Letters & http://t.co/AETupNMtCi)
@NurseLovesFarmr http://t.co/ShrVbbiLbo is an article critical of an anti-roundup study #GMODairy (good to read both sides)
New paper "Plurality of opinion, scientific discourse and pseudoscience" slams #Seralini "research" on rats. http://t.co/VQe1xNthrp
Plurality of opinion, scientific discourse and pseudoscience: an in depth analysis of the Séralini et al. study http://t.co/Z5Ye8Ygcfc
@marcianamb ¿el paper de Seralini? take a look http://t.co/Z5Ye8Ygcfc
Plurality of opinion, scientific discourse and pseudoscience: an in depth analysis of the Séralini et al. study http://t.co/YxVe6Ux346
#GMO Arjo et al.: "The study of Seralini ignores the minimal standards of scientific and ethical conduct" http://t.co/CGXOayWfpi
#GMO - Publication : Errors and inaccuracies in the article of #Seralini http://t.co/CGXOayWfpi http://t.co/4f5tUpo7ij
#Pseudoscience, inexactitudes et conclusions fallacieuses: analyse détaillée de l'étude #Séralini http://t.co/zisxHcfIKH #OGM @Springer
#Pseudoscience: in depth analysis of the #Séralini study claiming that RR #corn causes #cancer in rats http://t.co/zisxHcfIKH #GMO @Springer
L'étude Séralini ignore les standarts scientifiques et éthiques : http://t.co/WetuLqTHtj
L'étude Séralini ignore les standarts scientifiques et éthiques : article scientifique : http://t.co/FVB4TKlFth
RT @AnthonyGuihur: Encore un nouvel article qui enterre l'étude de Séralini http://t.co/TdGsn1Wv2z il en faudra encore combien ? @L_Berthod @jdflaysakier
RT @AnthonyGuihur: Encore un nouvel article qui enterre l'étude de Séralini http://t.co/TdGsn1Wv2z il en faudra encore combien ? @L_Berthod @jdflaysakier
Encore un nouvel article qui enterre l'étude de Séralini http://t.co/TdGsn1Wv2z il en faudra encore combien ? @L_Berthod @jdflaysakier
RT @christofab: New paper by Arjo et al seriously discredits link between herbicides, GMOs & cancer http://t.co/cWMrISRXw9 via @mark_lynas
RT @christofab: New paper by Arjo et al seriously discredits link between herbicides, GMOs & cancer http://t.co/cWMrISRXw9 via @mark_lynas
RT @christofab: New paper by Arjo et al seriously discredits link between herbicides, GMOs & cancer http://t.co/cWMrISRXw9 via @mark_lynas
RT @ReskiLab: #Seralini anti #GMO #junkscience #ratstudy debunked again by #science. #farm #ag #health http://t.co/LBN0wm3P3o
Genetically modified maize does not cause cancer http://t.co/dGSe6bAfgz #GMO #biotech
"@ReskiLab: Gen-Mais verursacht KEINEN Krebs: http://t.co/Qq6WEZ4bMW @gruenehessen @GrueneBW @gruenelvnds
RT @Hirn_Knoten: "@ReskiLab: Gen-Mais verursacht KEIN Krebs: http://t.co/Qq6WEZ4bMW #Gentechnik @Die_Gruenen @greenpeace_de @danielmack
RT @ShamAndScience: "The study appeared to ignore the minimal standards of scientific and ethical conduct" #seralini http://t.co/WRz755giAM via @gmopundit
RT @Hirn_Knoten: "@ReskiLab: Gen-Mais verursacht KEIN Krebs: http://t.co/Qq6WEZ4bMW #Gentechnik @Die_Gruenen @greenpeace_de @danielmack
"@ReskiLab: Gen-Mais verursacht KEIN Krebs: http://t.co/Qq6WEZ4bMW #Gentechnik @Die_Gruenen @greenpeace_de @danielmack
#Seralini anti #GMO #junkscience #ratstudy debunked again by #science. #farm #ag #health http://t.co/LBN0wm3P3o
RT @ShamAndScience: "The study appeared to ignore the minimal standards of scientific and ethical conduct" #seralini http://t.co/WRz755giAM via @gmopundit
Paper by Arjo et al highlights ethical responsibilities of scientists, peer review & our relationships w media http://t.co/cWMrISRXw9
New paper by Arjo et al seriously discredits link between herbicides, GMOs & cancer http://t.co/cWMrISRXw9 via @mark_lynas
RT @aricroch: Plurality of opinion, scientific discourse and pseudoscience: an in depth analysis of the Séralini et al. http://t.co/Vp1qyqjE1K
Plurality of opinion, scientific discourse and pseudoscience: an in depth analysis of the Séralini et al. http://t.co/Vp1qyqjE1K
RT @shanthu_s: Transgenic Research just published an on-line first perspective on the Seralini debacle. http://t.co/YgjiTyJsZM
"The study appeared to ignore the minimal standards of scientific and ethical conduct" #seralini http://t.co/WRz755giAM via @gmopundit
Another paper about seralini http://t.co/JB8Pnhmlxn
RT @shanthu_s: Transgenic Research just published an on-line first perspective on the Seralini debacle. http://t.co/YgjiTyJsZM
Plurality of opinion, scientific discourse and pseudoscience: an in depth analysis of the Séralini study #GMO Feb2013 http://t.co/fmkwRRj7aV
RT @AgBioEye: Transgenic Research, Feb. 2013: Seralini rat paper is "pseudoscience". Strong words, for a journal. http://t.co/xTJe2R7Ic6
RT @AgBioEye: Transgenic Research, Feb. 2013: Seralini rat paper is "pseudoscience". Strong words, for a journal. http://t.co/xTJe2R7Ic6
RT @AgBioEye: Transgenic Research, Feb. 2013: Seralini rat paper is "pseudoscience". Strong words, for a journal. http://t.co/xTJe2R7Ic6
RT @agbiotech: Scathing review of #Seralini study finds it ignored "all known benchmarks of scientific good practice." http://t.co/mHn0S4t28D #GMO
RT @agbiotech: Scathing review of #Seralini study finds it ignored "all known benchmarks of scientific good practice." http://t.co/mHn0S4t28D #GMO
RT @agbiotech: Scathing review of #Seralini study finds it ignored "all known benchmarks of scientific good practice." http://t.co/mHn0S4t28D #GMO
Scathing review of #Seralini study finds it ignored "all known benchmarks of scientific good practice." http://t.co/mHn0S4t28D #GMO
RT @AgBioWorld: Plurality of opinion, scientific discourse and pseudoscience: an in depth analysis of the Séralini et al. study http://t.co/JQpfARBhZd
RT @AgBioWorld: Plurality of opinion, scientific discourse and pseudoscience: an in depth analysis of the Séralini et al. study http://t.co/JQpfARBhZd
RT @AgBioWorld: Plurality of opinion, scientific discourse and pseudoscience: an in depth analysis of the Séralini et al. study http://t.co/JQpfARBhZd
RT @AgBioEye: Transgenic Research, Feb. 2013: Seralini rat paper is "pseudoscience". Strong words, for a journal. http://t.co/xTJe2R7Ic6
Transgenic Research, Feb. 2013: Seralini rat paper is "pseudoscience". Strong words, for a journal. http://t.co/xTJe2R7Ic6
RT @AgBioWorld: Plurality of opinion, scientific discourse and pseudoscience: an in depth analysis of the Séralini et al. study http://t.co/JQpfARBhZd
Plurality of opinion, scientific discourse and pseudoscience: an in depth analysis of the Séralini et al. study http://t.co/JQpfARBhZd