| Title |
A systematic review and recommendations for prom instruments for older people with frailty in emergency care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, April 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41687-022-00438-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
James David van Oppen, Abdullah Alshibani, Timothy John Coats, Blair Graham, Patricia Holch, Jagruti Lalseta, Nicola Mackintosh, Vivien Richardson, Peter Riley, Jose M. Valderas, Simon Paul Conroy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 26% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 14 | 61% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 65% |
| Scientists | 5 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 15% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 15% |
| Unknown | 16 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 9% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2022.
All research outputs
#2,558,757
of 25,171,741 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#33
of 639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,579
of 437,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#4
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,171,741 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 639 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,015 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.