Title |
Deriving clinically meaningful cut-scores for fatigue in a cohort of breast cancer survivors: a Health, Eating, Activity, and Lifestyle (HEAL) Study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Quality of Life Research, February 2013
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11136-013-0360-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Angela M. Stover, Bryce B. Reeve, Barbara F. Piper, Catherine M. Alfano, Ashley Wilder Smith, Sandra A. Mitchell, Leslie Bernstein, Kathy B. Baumgartner, Anne McTiernan, Rachel Ballard-Barbash |
Abstract |
To empirically determine clinically meaningful cut-scores on the 0-10 response scale of the revised Piper Fatigue Scale (PFS-R) and its shorter version (PFS-12). Breast cancer survivors were classified (i.e., none, mild, moderate, or severe fatigue) based on the cut-scores, and relationships between these cut-scores and decrements in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) were examined. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 71 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 11 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
Other | 5 | 7% |
Other | 14 | 20% |
Unknown | 18 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 25% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 23% |
Psychology | 5 | 7% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Other | 7 | 10% |
Unknown | 21 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2013.
All research outputs
#20,182,546
of 22,696,971 outputs
Outputs from Quality of Life Research
#2,578
of 2,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,771
of 193,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quality of Life Research
#14
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,696,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,841 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,023 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.