↓ Skip to main content

Use of 3D Printing for Medical Education Models in Transplantation Medicine: a Critical Review

Overview of attention for article published in Current Transplantation Reports, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
Title
Use of 3D Printing for Medical Education Models in Transplantation Medicine: a Critical Review
Published in
Current Transplantation Reports, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/s40472-016-0088-7
Authors

Ellen K. O’Brien, Diane B. Wayne, Katherine A. Barsness, William C. McGaghie, Jeffrey H. Barsuk

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Unknown 62 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 25%
Student > Master 14 22%
Unspecified 7 11%
Professor 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Other 17 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 20 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 22%
Unspecified 10 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 5%
Other 14 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2017.
All research outputs
#4,748,032
of 9,222,312 outputs
Outputs from Current Transplantation Reports
#17
of 78 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,194
of 259,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Transplantation Reports
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 9,222,312 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 78 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,032 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.