↓ Skip to main content

SSEP N20 and P25 amplitudes predict poor and good neurologic outcomes after cardiac arrest

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, March 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
SSEP N20 and P25 amplitudes predict poor and good neurologic outcomes after cardiac arrest
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, March 2022
DOI 10.1186/s13613-022-00999-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah Benghanem, Lee S. Nguyen, Martine Gavaret, Jean-Paul Mira, Frédéric Pène, Julien Charpentier, Angela Marchi, Alain Cariou

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Librarian 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 10 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 10%
Neuroscience 1 5%
Unknown 13 62%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2022.
All research outputs
#1,769,376
of 22,684,168 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#209
of 1,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,792
of 437,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#9
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,684,168 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,033 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.