| Title |
Explication and Definition of Mental Health Recovery: A Systematic Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, October 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10488-016-0767-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marsha Langer Ellison, Lindsay K. Belanger, Barbara L. Niles, Leigh C. Evans, Mark S. Bauer |
| Abstract |
This review assessed the concordance of the literature on recovery with the definition and components of recovery developed by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). Each SAMHSA identified recovery component was first explicated with synonyms and keywords and made mutually exclusive by authors. Inter-rater reliability was established on the coding of the presence of 17 recovery components and dimensions in 67 literature reviews on the recovery concept in mental health. The review indicated that concordance varied across SAMHSA components. The components of recovery with greatest concordance were: individualized/person centered, empowerment, purpose, and hope. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 43% |
| United States | 2 | 29% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
| Scientists | 2 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 207 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 14% |
| Researcher | 18 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 32 | 15% |
| Unknown | 61 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 47 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 31 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 30 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 7% |
| Unknown | 71 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2018.
All research outputs
#7,827,006
of 25,072,471 outputs
Outputs from Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
#277
of 695 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,791
of 326,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,072,471 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 695 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,467 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.