↓ Skip to main content

Unreliable pulse oximetry in dark-skin patients: a plea for algorithm disclosure

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, February 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Unreliable pulse oximetry in dark-skin patients: a plea for algorithm disclosure
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, February 2022
DOI 10.1186/s13613-022-00993-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin J. Tobin, Amal Jubran

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 25%
Other 1 13%
Professor 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 50%
Engineering 2 25%
Chemistry 1 13%
Physics and Astronomy 1 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2022.
All research outputs
#5,898,661
of 23,317,888 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#552
of 1,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,580
of 441,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#21
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,317,888 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,063 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.1. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,673 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.