| Title |
One planet: one health. A call to support the initiative on a global science–policy body on chemicals and waste
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Sciences Europe, March 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12302-022-00602-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Werner Brack, Damia Barcelo Culleres, Alistair B. A. Boxall, Hélène Budzinski, Sara Castiglioni, Adrian Covaci, Valeria Dulio, Beate I. Escher, Peter Fantke, Faith Kandie, Despo Fatta-Kassinos, Félix J. Hernández, Klara Hilscherová, Juliane Hollender, Henner Hollert, Annika Jahnke, Barbara Kasprzyk-Hordern, Stuart J. Khan, Andreas Kortenkamp, Klaus Kümmerer, Brice Lalonde, Marja H. Lamoree, Yves Levi, Pablo Antonio Lara Martín, Cassiana C. Montagner, Christian Mougin, Titus Msagati, Jörg Oehlmann, Leo Posthuma, Malcolm Reid, Martin Reinhard, Susan D. Richardson, Pawel Rostkowski, Emma Schymanski, Flurina Schneider, Jaroslav Slobodnik, Yasuyuki Shibata, Shane Allen Snyder, Fernando Fabriz Sodré, Ivana Teodorovic, Kevin V. Thomas, Gisela A. Umbuzeiro, Pham Hung Viet, Karina Gin Yew-Hoong, Xiaowei Zhang, Ettore Zuccato |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 21% |
| Germany | 4 | 9% |
| Cyprus | 3 | 6% |
| Australia | 2 | 4% |
| Spain | 2 | 4% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 19 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 25 | 53% |
| Scientists | 20 | 43% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 137 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 7% |
| Professor | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 15% |
| Unknown | 46 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 22 | 16% |
| Chemistry | 14 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 10 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 5% |
| Engineering | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 12% |
| Unknown | 62 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,088,576
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Sciences Europe
#68
of 623 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,903
of 449,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Sciences Europe
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 623 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,330 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.