↓ Skip to main content

Phytochemical characterization and evaluation of Antiurolithiatic activity of selected source plants of Pashanabheda

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Phytoscience, March 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Phytochemical characterization and evaluation of Antiurolithiatic activity of selected source plants of Pashanabheda
Published in
Clinical Phytoscience, March 2022
DOI 10.1186/s40816-022-00344-1
Authors

Sulaiman C. T, Jyothi C. K, Jinu Krishnan Unnithan G, Prabhukumar K. M, Indira Balachandran

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Unknown 11 92%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 8%
Unknown 10 83%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2022.
All research outputs
#15,705,568
of 23,339,727 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Phytoscience
#31
of 64 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#252,090
of 440,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Phytoscience
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,339,727 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 64 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,597 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them