| Title |
Recombinant human interleukin-7 reverses T cell exhaustion ex vivo in critically ill COVID-19 patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, March 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-022-00982-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Frank Bidar, Sarah Hamada, Morgane Gossez, Remy Coudereau, Jonathan Lopez, Marie-Angelique Cazalis, Claire Tardiveau, Karen Brengel-Pesce, Marine Mommert, Marielle Buisson, Filippo Conti, Thomas Rimmelé, Anne-Claire Lukaszewicz, Laurent Argaud, Martin Cour, Guillaume Monneret, Fabienne Venet |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| France | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 5 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,573,432
of 23,106,934 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#189
of 1,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,482
of 438,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#5
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,106,934 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,054 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,441 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.