↓ Skip to main content

Academic failures and co-location social networks in campus

Overview of attention for article published in EPJ Data Science, February 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Academic failures and co-location social networks in campus
Published in
EPJ Data Science, February 2022
DOI 10.1140/epjds/s13688-022-00322-0
Authors

Shan Lu, Jichang Zhao, Huiwen Wang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 38%
Professor 1 13%
Unspecified 1 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 13%
Lecturer 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 4 50%
Unspecified 1 13%
Physics and Astronomy 1 13%
Social Sciences 1 13%
Unknown 1 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2022.
All research outputs
#12,999,854
of 22,049,914 outputs
Outputs from EPJ Data Science
#334
of 365 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,798
of 338,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EPJ Data Science
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,049,914 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 365 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.1. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,401 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them