↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating the Effect of Saliency Detection and Attention Manipulation in Human-Robot Interaction

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Social Robotics, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Evaluating the Effect of Saliency Detection and Attention Manipulation in Human-Robot Interaction
Published in
International Journal of Social Robotics, November 2012
DOI 10.1007/s12369-012-0174-7
Authors

Guido Schillaci, Saša Bodiroža, Verena Vanessa Hafner

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 5%
United States 2 4%
Netherlands 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 48 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 25%
Student > Postgraduate 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Researcher 4 7%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 4 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 24 44%
Psychology 10 18%
Engineering 7 13%
Design 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 5 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2013.
All research outputs
#11,103,069
of 12,485,735 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Social Robotics
#128
of 148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#213,599
of 254,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Social Robotics
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,485,735 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 148 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,376 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.