↓ Skip to main content

Patient and physician preferences for non-invasive diagnostic cardiovascular imaging technologies: a discrete choice experiment

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, February 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Patient and physician preferences for non-invasive diagnostic cardiovascular imaging technologies: a discrete choice experiment
Published in
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, February 2022
DOI 10.1186/s41687-022-00419-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas Bertrand, Gillian Bartlett-Esquilant, Kady Fischer, Matthias G. Friedrich

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 36%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 14%
Unspecified 1 7%
Librarian 1 7%
Student > Master 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 3 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 14%
Social Sciences 2 14%
Unspecified 1 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 7%
Other 3 21%
Unknown 3 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2022.
All research outputs
#14,933,557
of 23,179,757 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#280
of 512 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#230,319
of 439,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#14
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,179,757 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 512 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,592 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.