↓ Skip to main content

Critical evaluation of the microbial turnover to biomass approach for the estimation of biogenic non-extractable residues (NER)

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Sciences Europe, February 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Critical evaluation of the microbial turnover to biomass approach for the estimation of biogenic non-extractable residues (NER)
Published in
Environmental Sciences Europe, February 2022
DOI 10.1186/s12302-022-00592-5
Authors

Stefan Trapp, Andreas Libonati Brock, Matthias Kästner, Andreas Schäffer, Dieter Hennecke

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 20%
Lecturer 1 20%
Other 1 20%
Student > Master 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 1 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 20%
Computer Science 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2022.
All research outputs
#17,636,442
of 21,821,479 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Sciences Europe
#433
of 559 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#244,373
of 336,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Sciences Europe
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,821,479 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 559 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,755 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them