↓ Skip to main content

Defining Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Pain Management

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#35 of 7,317)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
20 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
269 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
327 Mendeley
Title
Defining Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Pain Management
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, July 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11999-011-1770-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jana M Mossey

Abstract

Substantial pain prevalence is as high as 40% in community populations. There is consistent evidence that racial/ethnic minority individuals are overrepresented among those who experience such pain and whose pain management is inadequate.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 327 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Ukraine 1 <1%
Unknown 319 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 51 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 42 13%
Student > Bachelor 38 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 9%
Researcher 26 8%
Other 62 19%
Unknown 77 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 95 29%
Psychology 33 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 9%
Social Sciences 24 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 4%
Other 40 12%
Unknown 92 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 130. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2022.
All research outputs
#322,016
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#35
of 7,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,100
of 127,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#5
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,317 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,494 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.