↓ Skip to main content

L-carnitine does not improve valproic acid poisoning management: a cohort study with toxicokinetics and concentration/effect relationships

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
L-carnitine does not improve valproic acid poisoning management: a cohort study with toxicokinetics and concentration/effect relationships
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, January 2022
DOI 10.1186/s13613-022-00984-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philippe Nguyen, Lucie Chevillard, Ahmed S. Gouda, Hervé Gourlain, Laurence Labat, Isabelle Malissin, Nicolas Deye, Sebastian Voicu, Bruno Mégarbane

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 15%
Student > Bachelor 2 15%
Unspecified 1 8%
Lecturer 1 8%
Student > Postgraduate 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 23%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 15%
Psychology 1 8%
Unspecified 1 8%
Unknown 6 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2022.
All research outputs
#13,511,215
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#709
of 1,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,411
of 508,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#29
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,063 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.1. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 508,911 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.