↓ Skip to main content

Cortical thinning in young psychosis and bipolar patients correlate with common neurocognitive deficits

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Bipolar Disorders, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
Cortical thinning in young psychosis and bipolar patients correlate with common neurocognitive deficits
Published in
International Journal of Bipolar Disorders, April 2013
DOI 10.1186/2194-7511-1-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sean N Hatton, Jim Lagopoulos, Daniel F Hermens, Elizabeth Scott, Ian B Hickie, Maxwell R Bennett

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 69 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 16%
Other 9 13%
Researcher 9 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Student > Postgraduate 7 10%
Other 15 21%
Unknown 12 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 16 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 17%
Neuroscience 12 17%
Unspecified 3 4%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 18 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2016.
All research outputs
#15,385,802
of 22,890,496 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Bipolar Disorders
#209
of 285 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,808
of 197,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Bipolar Disorders
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,890,496 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 285 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,886 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them