| Title |
Practices in sedation, analgesia, mobilization, delirium, and sleep deprivation in adult intensive care units (SAMDS-ICU): an international survey before and during the COVID-19 pandemic
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, February 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-022-00985-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mariana Luz, Bruna Brandão Barreto, Roberta Esteves Vieira de Castro, Jorge Salluh, Felipe Dal-Pizzol, Caio Araujo, Audrey De Jong, Gérald Chanques, Sheila Nainan Myatra, Eduardo Tobar, Carolina Gimenez-Esparza Vich, Federico Carini, Eugene Wesley Ely, Joanna L. Stollings, Kelly Drumright, John Kress, Pedro Povoa, Yahya Shehabi, Wilson Mphandi, Dimitri Gusmao-Flores |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 52 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 9 | 17% |
| United States | 3 | 6% |
| Colombia | 2 | 4% |
| France | 2 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 26 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 43 | 83% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 8% |
| Scientists | 4 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 93 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 8% |
| Researcher | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 17% |
| Unknown | 36 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 16% |
| Psychology | 4 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Unknown | 38 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,177,329
of 25,750,437 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#133
of 1,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,443
of 521,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#6
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,750,437 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,212 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 521,522 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.