This relies on Harris et al. 2013 http://t.co/x3KGMvSkxJ
New paper suggests transient climate response = 1.6-2.4C (10-90%) HT @shrinkfoot http://t.co/ZGB2QbeISG
New paper suggests TCR=1.6-2.4C (10-90%) HT @shrinkfoot http://t.co/ZGB2QbeISG @aDissentient
Findings of new paper suggest that #GlobalWarming likely to continue at worrisome pace. http://t.co/6vwWtAaHII
RT @richardabetts Another paper on observational constraints on Transient Climate Response: http://t.co/hSZAExwJTB …
RT @GarethSJones1: Shame Harris's paper suggesting TCR=1.6-2.4C (10-90%) not had as much impact in blogosphere/media as Otto paper http://t.co/WPwUE1Usy5 ($)
Shame Harris's paper suggesting TCR=1.6-2.4C (10-90%) not had as much impact in blogosphere/media as Otto paper http://t.co/WPwUE1Usy5 ($)
RT @richardabetts: @MichaelEMann @ClimateSpec @NatureClimate Another paper on observational constraints on Transient Climate Response: http://t.co/dHatMOOjEc
RT @richardabetts: @MichaelEMann @ClimateSpec @NatureClimate Another paper on observational constraints on Transient Climate Response: http://t.co/dHatMOOjEc
RT @richardabetts: @MichaelEMann @ClimateSpec @NatureClimate Another paper on observational constraints on Transient Climate Response: http://t.co/dHatMOOjEc
RT @richardabetts: @MichaelEMann @ClimateSpec @NatureClimate Another paper on observational constraints on Transient Climate Response: http://t.co/dHatMOOjEc
@MichaelEMann @ClimateSpec @NatureClimate Another paper on observational constraints on Transient Climate Response: http://t.co/dHatMOOjEc
RT @ed_hawkins: A new observationally constrained estimate of climate sensitivity by Harris et al. suggests TCR = 1.6-2.4K (10-90%) | http://t.co/A8iHkZuCPp
RT @ed_hawkins: A new observationally constrained estimate of climate sensitivity by Harris et al. suggests TCR = 1.6-2.4K (10-90%) | http://t.co/A8iHkZuCPp
RT @readfearn: Study has near-term global warming at likely 2C http://t.co/YvSMn8c48r which is higher than 1.3C from study last wk. http://t.co/WInt5zgTz8
RT @ret_ward: New study concludes transient climate response 90% likely to be between 1.6 and 2.4 degC, median 2.0 degC: http://t.co/CMybJ9DUCV
RT @Peters_Glen: Do we rely on the simple or complex approach for TCS? Otto et al http://t.co/w1Pod75iU2 or Harris et al http://t.co/uthrOA3Ibh
Do we rely on the simple or complex approach for TCS? Otto et al http://t.co/w1Pod75iU2 or Harris et al http://t.co/uthrOA3Ibh
RT @readfearn: Study has near-term global warming at likely 2C http://t.co/YvSMn8c48r which is higher than 1.3C from study last wk. http://t.co/WInt5zgTz8
RT @readfearn: Study has near-term global warming at likely 2C http://t.co/YvSMn8c48r which is higher than 1.3C from study last wk. http://t.co/WInt5zgTz8
RT @readfearn: Study has near-term global warming at likely 2C http://t.co/YvSMn8c48r which is higher than 1.3C from study last wk. http://t.co/WInt5zgTz8
RT @ret_ward: New study concludes transient climate response 90% likely to be between 1.6 and 2.4 degC, median 2.0 degC: http://t.co/CMybJ9DUCV
RT @ret_ward: New study concludes transient climate response 90% likely to be between 1.6 and 2.4 degC, median 2.0 degC: http://t.co/CMybJ9DUCV
RT @ret_ward: New study concludes transient climate response 90% likely to be between 1.6 and 2.4 degC, median 2.0 degC: http://t.co/CMybJ9DUCV
More TCR via @ret_ward Study: transient climate response 90% likely to be between 1.6 and 2.4 degC, median 2.0 degC: http://t.co/6ahafWJfUE
.@mattwridley @hannahdev @timesletters Will you be writing a new article for The Times about this new paper? http://t.co/CMybJ9DUCV
New study concludes transient climate response 90% likely to be between 1.6 and 2.4 degC, median 2.0 degC: http://t.co/CMybJ9DUCV
Study has near-term global warming at likely 2C http://t.co/YvSMn8c48r which is higher than 1.3C from study last wk. http://t.co/WInt5zgTz8
RT @ed_hawkins: A new observationally constrained estimate of climate sensitivity by Harris et al. suggests TCR = 1.6-2.4K (10-90%) | http://t.co/A8iHkZuCPp
RT @ed_hawkins: A new observationally constrained estimate of climate sensitivity by Harris et al. suggests TCR = 1.6-2.4K (10-90%) | http://t.co/A8iHkZuCPp
RT @ed_hawkins: A new observationally constrained estimate of climate sensitivity by Harris et al. suggests TCR = 1.6-2.4K (10-90%) | http://t.co/A8iHkZuCPp
RT @ed_hawkins: A new observationally constrained estimate of climate sensitivity by Harris et al. suggests TCR = 1.6-2.4K (10-90%) | http://t.co/A8iHkZuCPp
RT @ed_hawkins: A new observationally constrained estimate of climate sensitivity by Harris et al. suggests TCR = 1.6-2.4K (10-90%) | http://t.co/A8iHkZuCPp
A new observationally constrained estimate of climate sensitivity by Harris et al. suggests TCR = 1.6-2.4K (10-90%) | http://t.co/A8iHkZuCPp
RT @mammuthus: "Probabilistic projections of transient climate change" http://t.co/3k2BaJCv2w
RT @MagWes: Probabilistic projections of transient climate change http://t.co/9FSqDRQuAU "climate sensitivity" as IPCC #swgreen
"Probabilistic projections of transient climate change" http://t.co/3k2BaJCv2w
Probabilistic projections of transient climate change http://t.co/9FSqDRQuAU "climate sensitivity" as IPCC #swgreen
RT @AGWobserver: Probabilistic projections of transient climate change http://t.co/MOu40Xe8DJ
RT @AGWobserver: Probabilistic projections of transient climate change http://t.co/MOu40Xe8DJ
Probabilistic projections of transient climate change http://t.co/MOu40Xe8DJ
RT @GarethSJones1: Harris etal "Probabilistic projections of transient climate change" http://t.co/rNmfSgNN HadCM3/bayes/SCMs/TCR ... what more do you want!
Harris etal "Probabilistic projections of transient climate change" http://t.co/rNmfSgNN HadCM3/bayes/SCMs/TCR ... what more do you want!
Glen Harris' lengthy tome on probabilistic climate projection, including TCR estimates http://t.co/T1qfoxMR