| Title |
Accounting for water use in Australian red meat production
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, February 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11367-010-0161-x |
| Authors |
Greg M. Peters, Stephen G. Wiedemann, Hazel V. Rowley, Robyn W. Tucker |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 19% |
| Australia | 4 | 13% |
| Canada | 2 | 6% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Samoa | 1 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 87% |
| Scientists | 2 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 196 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 4 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 1% |
| Sweden | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 184 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 39 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 40 | 20% |
| Unknown | 37 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 58 | 30% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 13% |
| Engineering | 21 | 11% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 9 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 29 | 15% |
| Unknown | 45 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,047,787
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
#42
of 1,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,281
of 181,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
#1
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,131 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,626 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.