↓ Skip to main content

Auger electrons for cancer therapy – a review

Overview of attention for article published in EJNMMI Radiopharmacy and Chemistry, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
207 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
294 Mendeley
Title
Auger electrons for cancer therapy – a review
Published in
EJNMMI Radiopharmacy and Chemistry, October 2019
DOI 10.1186/s41181-019-0075-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anthony Ku, Valerie J. Facca, Zhongli Cai, Raymond M. Reilly

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 294 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 294 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 62 21%
Student > Master 35 12%
Student > Bachelor 27 9%
Researcher 25 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 4%
Other 34 12%
Unknown 99 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 59 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 27 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 8%
Physics and Astronomy 21 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 19 6%
Other 35 12%
Unknown 109 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2022.
All research outputs
#7,553,524
of 23,041,514 outputs
Outputs from EJNMMI Radiopharmacy and Chemistry
#28
of 94 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,884
of 352,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EJNMMI Radiopharmacy and Chemistry
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,041,514 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 94 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,955 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.