| Title |
Comparative efficacy of nonhormonal drugs on menopausal hot flashes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, July 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00228-016-2090-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lujin Li, Ling Xu, Junyi Wu, Lidan Dong, Shuiyu Zhao, Qingshan Zheng |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 117 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 45 | 38% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 13% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Researcher | 4 | 3% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 37 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 13% |
| Unknown | 38 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2024.
All research outputs
#8,030,636
of 25,559,053 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#884
of 2,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,749
of 379,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#13
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,559,053 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,763 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 379,255 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.