↓ Skip to main content

Reasons for using web-based counselling among family and friends impacted by problem gambling

Overview of attention for article published in Asian Journal of Gambling Issues and Public Health, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Reasons for using web-based counselling among family and friends impacted by problem gambling
Published in
Asian Journal of Gambling Issues and Public Health, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/2195-3007-3-12
Authors

Simone N Rodda, Dan I Lubman, Nicki A Dowling, Terence V McCann

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 32%
Researcher 3 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Librarian 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 9 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 13 46%
Computer Science 3 11%
Social Sciences 3 11%
Unknown 9 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2016.
All research outputs
#17,916,870
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Asian Journal of Gambling Issues and Public Health
#31
of 42 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,776
of 214,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Asian Journal of Gambling Issues and Public Health
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one scored the same or higher as 11 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,035 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.