| Title |
Vaccine-associated complications: a comparative multicenter evaluation among dental practitioners and dental students—which candidate vaccine is more safe in SARS COV II, Gam-COVID-Vac (Sputnik V), ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AstraZeneca), BBV152 (Covaxin), or BBIBP-CorV(Sinopharm)?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40902-021-00330-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Behzad Houshmand, Seied Omid Keyhan, Hamid Reza Fallahi, Shaqayeq Ramezanzade, Erfan Sadeghi, Parisa Yousefi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 4 | 33% |
| United States | 3 | 25% |
| Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 13% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
| Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 17 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 24% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 18 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2022.
All research outputs
#4,155,829
of 25,661,882 outputs
Outputs from Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
#3
of 83 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,330
of 520,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,661,882 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 520,296 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them