↓ Skip to main content

Vaccine-associated complications: a comparative multicenter evaluation among dental practitioners and dental students—which candidate vaccine is more safe in SARS COV II, Gam-COVID-Vac (Sputnik V)…

Overview of attention for article published in Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
Vaccine-associated complications: a comparative multicenter evaluation among dental practitioners and dental students—which candidate vaccine is more safe in SARS COV II, Gam-COVID-Vac (Sputnik V), ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AstraZeneca), BBV152 (Covaxin), or BBIBP-CorV(Sinopharm)?
Published in
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, January 2022
DOI 10.1186/s40902-021-00330-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Behzad Houshmand, Seied Omid Keyhan, Hamid Reza Fallahi, Shaqayeq Ramezanzade, Erfan Sadeghi, Parisa Yousefi

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 14 25%
Student > Bachelor 9 16%
Researcher 6 11%
Other 4 7%
Professor 2 4%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 13 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 14 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 20%
Neuroscience 6 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Engineering 2 4%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 13 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2022.
All research outputs
#3,938,841
of 22,977,819 outputs
Outputs from Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
#1
of 69 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,560
of 505,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,977,819 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 69 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 505,439 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them