| Title |
Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic rectal resection for cancer in a single surgeon’s experience: a cost analysis covering the initial 50 robotic cases with the da Vinci Si
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Colorectal Disease, July 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00384-016-2631-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Luca Morelli, Simone Guadagni, Valentina Lorenzoni, Gregorio Di Franco, Luigi Cobuccio, Matteo Palmeri, Giovanni Caprili, Cristiano D’Isidoro, Andrea Moglia, Vincenzo Ferrari, Giulio Di Candio, Franco Mosca, Giuseppe Turchetti |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 75% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 91 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 18% |
| Researcher | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 10% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 13% |
| Unknown | 28 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 38% |
| Engineering | 6 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 35 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2020.
All research outputs
#4,667,014
of 22,889,074 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Colorectal Disease
#178
of 1,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,111
of 365,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Colorectal Disease
#3
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,889,074 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,831 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,412 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.