Title |
Potential of the non‐weight‐bearing tunnel view in diagnosing medial meniscus posterior root tear: a pilot study of X‐ray characteristics
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics, October 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40634-021-00421-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hiroki Okamura, Hiroki Ishikawa, Takuya Ohno, Shogo Fujita, Shigeo Yamakami, Hirotaka Akezuma, Koji Ishikawa, Katsunori Inagaki |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Luxembourg | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 27% |
Researcher | 2 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 7 | 47% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 27% |
Engineering | 3 | 20% |
Unknown | 8 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2022.
All research outputs
#18,478,448
of 22,896,955 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
#252
of 329 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#312,707
of 436,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
#24
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,896,955 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 329 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,775 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.