↓ Skip to main content

The activation of segmental and tonal information in visual word recognition

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
The activation of segmental and tonal information in visual word recognition
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, February 2013
DOI 10.3758/s13423-013-0395-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chuchu Li, Candise Y. Lin, Min Wang, Nan Jiang

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 8%
Canada 1 4%
Unknown 22 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 36%
Researcher 5 20%
Student > Master 3 12%
Other 2 8%
Professor 2 8%
Other 4 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 10 40%
Linguistics 10 40%
Unspecified 2 8%
Social Sciences 2 8%
Neuroscience 1 4%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2016.
All research outputs
#4,487,486
of 8,403,724 outputs
Outputs from Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
#822
of 1,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,026
of 253,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
#27
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,403,724 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,376 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,583 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.