DOI do artigo: https://t.co/pUs8AcJlRx
@NigelStarr1 @420ppmv @CedricHerrou Vous m'avez proposé des articles et je vous en remercie. En voici un : https://t.co/GqnphnST1Y Pour résumer, vous regardez la poussière dans l’œil du voisin...
The ‘Alice in Wonderland’ mechanics of the rejection of (climate) science: simulating coherence by conspiracism https://t.co/NDI143yYga
RT @BVerheggen: As described in "The ‘Alice in Wonderland’ mechanics of the rejection of (climate) science" by @STWorg et al https://t.co/E…
So, which is it...? https://t.co/E4Wj9asYmw https://t.co/m0qhMBF8NX
As described in "The ‘Alice in Wonderland’ mechanics of the rejection of (climate) science" by @STWorg et al https://t.co/E4Wj9asYmw In a conspiratorial mindset, claims that the globe “is cooling” can coexist with claims that the “observed warming is natur
RT @meistrephilipos: Contradições dos negacionistas do clima: 1. não dá pra medir acuradamente a temperatura global, mas sabemos q a tempe…
@gabriella_acp Os participantes deveriam ler o artigo linkado abaixo pra irem imunizados já https://t.co/WSdAORXl4L
Contradições dos negacionistas do clima: 1. não dá pra medir acuradamente a temperatura global, mas sabemos q a temperatura está diminuindo, não aumentando 2. CO2 mantém o planeta aquecido, mas não há conexão entre CO2 e aquecimento https://t.co/jHw4bbHo
"People who oppose this scientific body of knowledge because the implications of cutting GHG emissions...threaten their worldview or livelihood cannot provide an alternative view that is coherent by the standards of conventional scientific thinking." https
" Instead, we suggest that people who reject the fact that the Earth’s climate is changing due to greenhouse gas emissions ..oppose whatever inconvenient finding they are confronting in piece-meal fashion, .." https://t.co/MwmuHYaBlV
#10yrsago That’s Disgusting! Awesomely gross picture book https://t.co/kJGz09Rm5Q #5yrsago Climate denial’s internal contradictions spring from a need to defend economic doctrine https://t.co/UA7CqjxFsX 4/ https://t.co/nnpy14cIZq
@WhompyWombat @evcricket @elliemail @pg0268 @simonahac No expertise in climatology disciplines, no peer reviewed research publications. Died 2011. Many unprecedented events globally since then. Alignment with solar radiation theory debunked https://t.co/pO
"Coherence between (...) mutually contradictory opinions can only be achieved at a highly abstract level, namely that “something must be wrong” with the scientific evidence in order to justify a political position against climate change mitigation." https
"Coherence between (...) mutually contradictory opinions can only be achieved at a highly abstract level, namely that “something must be wrong” with the scientific evidence in order to justify a political position against climate change mitigation." https
@SachaEpskamp There's a reason why climate scientists have been feeling bad for epidemiologists since the beginning of the pandemic: https://t.co/KabiW9VSE4
@RDNS_TAI @FlatEarthGang "The ‘Alice in Wonderland’ mechanics of the rejection of (climate) science: simulating coherence by conspiracism." Stephan Lewandowsky, John Cook & Elisabeth Lloyd. https://t.co/bk8kqvRpoX
The ‘Alice in Wonderland’ mechanics of the rejection of (climate) science: simulating coherence by conspiracism Stephan Lewandowsky, John Cook & Elisabeth Lloyd . https://t.co/bk8kqvRpoX
٤.٢ هنا مثال حول (تورط التفكير التآمري في رفض علم المناخ !) https://t.co/2tZCdZb0Ql
الرواية الرسمية كاذبة "Conviction that official narrative is wrong" بدلا من تتبع الدليل حيث يقود, حتي وان قاد الي تصديق الرواية الرسمية, اصحاب النظرية يتمسكون بتكذيبهم لتلك الرواية, حتي اذا سقط دليلهم, فانهم يتشبثون بتكذيب الرواية الرسمية دون دليل https://
RT @LindaAshton2: @jackklok @ATomalty @ClimateRealists @anthonywatts @elliemail @GideonCRozner @Jacz_C @JennMarohasy I’ve provided many aut…
@jackklok @ATomalty @ClimateRealists @anthonywatts @elliemail @GideonCRozner @Jacz_C @JennMarohasy I’ve provided many authoritative links. Have you read those articles? All info you’ve offered is either unsourced or FF contaminated funding. Seems you didn’
@weneedaking @dpgillikin @MichaelEMann @skepticscience Any thoughts about Alice? https://t.co/YI9MTQTKon
RT @maxim_k: @weneedaking @dpgillikin @MichaelEMann @skepticscience I’ll watch it in the next hour or so. Have something for you to read in…
@weneedaking @dpgillikin @MichaelEMann @skepticscience I’ll watch it in the next hour or so. Have something for you to read in return: https://t.co/YI9MTQTKon
@vegasstrong91 @B0X_News @clio_oreo @IPCC_CH @weather_hk 🤦♂️Who said anything about the world coming to an end? Why not read the links in the article, and then keep going through the thread - be skeptical, man. Ask the questions. https://t.co/RTWyaxvVpr Y
@matzxl @maxim_k @Karcice07490000 @MalteKaufmann Ja. Ich habe Madeleine gleich mal blockiert. Ist aber schon witzig, wie sich die Phänomene aus diesem Artikel praktisch1:1 hier wiederfinden 🙂 https://t.co/ueWi3fAgWR
"The ‘Alice in Wonderland’ mechanics of the rejection of (climate) science: simulating coherence by conspiracism" @STWorg https://t.co/X3owPH7bP2
Just found this. Issues in #climatedenial. Have you heard of every one? I got caught on a couple! https://t.co/sxHBAcXRWG
RT @STWorg: @IanDunt Well, incoherence is a fundamental attribute of climate denial https://t.co/1Hcteo4i4j And Brexit is the political twi…
RT @STWorg: @IanDunt Well, incoherence is a fundamental attribute of climate denial https://t.co/1Hcteo4i4j And Brexit is the political twi…
RT @STWorg: @IanDunt Well, incoherence is a fundamental attribute of climate denial https://t.co/1Hcteo4i4j And Brexit is the political twi…
@IanDunt Well, incoherence is a fundamental attribute of climate denial https://t.co/1Hcteo4i4j And Brexit is the political twin of climate denial https://t.co/XxuoIIejYb. So no surprises, really.
@and_drew272 @AltUS_ARC @thegwpfcom @NikolovScience @FriendsOScience @wattsupwiththat For a more objective analysis of the nonsensical approach deniers as a group take: https://t.co/kQnlp7DSzm
In summary, there is growing evidence for an involvement of conspiracist ideation in the rejection of climate science, both in public discourse and on internet blogs. #climateCrisis #denial #ClimateChangeIsReal https://t.co/S5bLHvsrN5
RT @JesseGreener: An easy to read paper on the cognitive disconnect between anti-climate change crowd. "Why, sometimes I’ve believed as man…
RT @JesseGreener: An easy to read paper on the cognitive disconnect between anti-climate change crowd. "Why, sometimes I’ve believed as man…
An easy to read paper on the cognitive disconnect between anti-climate change crowd. "Why, sometimes I’ve believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast.”— The White Queen, in Through the Looking-Glass, and What Alice Found There https://t.co/
@vhdlrband @fordnation Are you saying temperatures are both decreasing and increasing in the same tweet? And what are you saying about CO2? It is a greenhouse gas, but just not from man? You are entering "Alice in Wonderland Territory": https://t.co/NcJI6I
@OrdyPackard @winklevosss @ScotsFyre @tempsanity98 Of course, my original post was in reply to Stacey. It's unclear whether you're arguing the same point, especially given documented incoherence amongst those who do not understand climate science. https://
RT @johnfocook: A tell-tale trait of incoherent climate denial is claiming that climate science is too uncertain to know anything, while kn…
Not to mention: "It's not happening", "It's not us", "It's not bad", "It's too late".
RT @johnfocook: A tell-tale trait of incoherent climate denial is claiming that climate science is too uncertain to know anything, while kn…
RT @johnfocook: A tell-tale trait of incoherent climate denial is claiming that climate science is too uncertain to know anything, while kn…
RT @johnfocook: A tell-tale trait of incoherent climate denial is claiming that climate science is too uncertain to know anything, while kn…
RT @johnfocook: A tell-tale trait of incoherent climate denial is claiming that climate science is too uncertain to know anything, while kn…
RT @johnfocook: A tell-tale trait of incoherent climate denial is claiming that climate science is too uncertain to know anything, while kn…
RT @johnfocook: A tell-tale trait of incoherent climate denial is claiming that climate science is too uncertain to know anything, while kn…
Now where have I seen this before
RT @johnfocook: A tell-tale trait of incoherent climate denial is claiming that climate science is too uncertain to know anything, while kn…
RT @johnfocook: A tell-tale trait of incoherent climate denial is claiming that climate science is too uncertain to know anything, while kn…
RT @johnfocook: A tell-tale trait of incoherent climate denial is claiming that climate science is too uncertain to know anything, while kn…
RT @johnfocook: A tell-tale trait of incoherent climate denial is claiming that climate science is too uncertain to know anything, while kn…
RT @johnfocook: A tell-tale trait of incoherent climate denial is claiming that climate science is too uncertain to know anything, while kn…
RT @johnfocook: A tell-tale trait of incoherent climate denial is claiming that climate science is too uncertain to know anything, while kn…
RT @johnfocook: A tell-tale trait of incoherent climate denial is claiming that climate science is too uncertain to know anything, while kn…
A tell-tale trait of incoherent climate denial is claiming that climate science is too uncertain to know anything, while knowing with absolute certainty that humans aren't causing climate change https://t.co/lWUSpqwPRi https://t.co/YOyEYJ1xMR
RT @tan123: John, if warmists like yourself are so coherent and consistent, why have you offered 66+ excuses for the hiatus? https://t.co/z…
@PeterFHyatt @AOC There is strong evidence that rejection of climate science is driven by ideological factors... People whose identity and worldview centres around free markets are particularly challenged by the findings from climate science. https://t.co/
This paper by @STWorg et al. gives an insight into the conspiratorial thinking of #ClimateChangeDenialists. A must read. #OpenAccess @UWApsych #ScientistsAreRight
Check out this open-access paper by Prof Stephan Lewandowsky @STWorg et al. on the mechanics of the rejection of (climate) science. https://t.co/sLBC6iA0Bl
RT @johnfocook: A feature of science denial is incoherence: deniers aren't interested in a consistent explanation of the world so they'll g…
RT @johnfocook: A feature of science denial is incoherence: deniers aren't interested in a consistent explanation of the world so they'll g…
RT @smbilodeau: Great study by @johnfocook, @STWorg & Elisabeth Lloyd on why, after 150 years+ of consistent science on #climate and #GHG e…
Great study by @johnfocook, @STWorg & Elisabeth Lloyd on why, after 150 years+ of consistent science on #climate and #GHG emissions, a small but vocal group of contrarian #denialist still exists, driven by ideological factors: the #conspiracist & (
RT @tan123: John, if warmists like yourself are so coherent and consistent, why have you offered 66+ excuses for the hiatus? https://t.co/z…
RT @DocRichard: This is crucial. Real science constructs a coherent picture of natural processes. AGW deniers just oppose each and every st…
RT @johnfocook: A feature of science denial is incoherence: deniers aren't interested in a consistent explanation of the world so they'll g…
How climate deniers contradict each other
RT @tan123: John, if warmists like yourself are so coherent and consistent, why have you offered 66+ excuses for the hiatus? https://t.co/z…
RT @johnfocook: A feature of science denial is incoherence: deniers aren't interested in a consistent explanation of the world so they'll g…
RT @johnfocook: A feature of science denial is incoherence: deniers aren't interested in a consistent explanation of the world so they'll g…
RT @johnfocook: A feature of science denial is incoherence: deniers aren't interested in a consistent explanation of the world so they'll g…
RT @tan123: John, if warmists like yourself are so coherent and consistent, why have you offered 66+ excuses for the hiatus? https://t.co/z…
RT @tan123: John, if warmists like yourself are so coherent and consistent, why have you offered 66+ excuses for the hiatus? https://t.co/z…
RT @johnfocook: A feature of science denial is incoherence: deniers aren't interested in a consistent explanation of the world so they'll g…
This is crucial. Real science constructs a coherent picture of natural processes. AGW deniers just oppose each and every statement made by climate scientists.
RT @tan123: John, if warmists like yourself are so coherent and consistent, why have you offered 66+ excuses for the hiatus? https://t.co/z…
RT @tan123: John, if warmists like yourself are so coherent and consistent, why have you offered 66+ excuses for the hiatus? https://t.co/z…
RT @johnfocook: A feature of science denial is incoherence: deniers aren't interested in a consistent explanation of the world so they'll g…
RT @tan123: John, if warmists like yourself are so coherent and consistent, why have you offered 66+ excuses for the hiatus? https://t.co/z…
RT @tan123: John, if warmists like yourself are so coherent and consistent, why have you offered 66+ excuses for the hiatus? https://t.co/z…
RT @tan123: John, if warmists like yourself are so coherent and consistent, why have you offered 66+ excuses for the hiatus? https://t.co/z…
RT @tan123: John, if warmists like yourself are so coherent and consistent, why have you offered 66+ excuses for the hiatus? https://t.co/z…
RT @tan123: John, if warmists like yourself are so coherent and consistent, why have you offered 66+ excuses for the hiatus? https://t.co/z…
RT @johnfocook: A feature of science denial is incoherence: deniers aren't interested in a consistent explanation of the world so they'll g…
John, if warmists like yourself are so coherent and consistent, why have you offered 66+ excuses for the hiatus? https://t.co/z2uJ0wk7nv
RT @johnfocook: A feature of science denial is incoherence: deniers aren't interested in a consistent explanation of the world so they'll g…
RT @johnfocook: A feature of science denial is incoherence: deniers aren't interested in a consistent explanation of the world so they'll g…
RT @johnfocook: A feature of science denial is incoherence: deniers aren't interested in a consistent explanation of the world so they'll g…