↓ Skip to main content

Toward nanofluids of ultra-high thermal conductivity

Overview of attention for article published in Nanoscale Research Letters, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
Toward nanofluids of ultra-high thermal conductivity
Published in
Nanoscale Research Letters, February 2011
DOI 10.1186/1556-276x-6-153
Pubmed ID
Authors

Liqiu Wang, Jing Fan

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
South Africa 1 2%
Unknown 42 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 36%
Student > Master 7 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 9%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 2 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 25 56%
Materials Science 6 13%
Physics and Astronomy 4 9%
Energy 2 4%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 3 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2022.
All research outputs
#7,480,713
of 22,867,327 outputs
Outputs from Nanoscale Research Letters
#208
of 1,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,692
of 106,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nanoscale Research Letters
#9
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,867,327 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,078 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,603 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.