↓ Skip to main content

Lymphoepithelial cyst with sebaceous glands of the pancreas: a case report

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Case Reports, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Lymphoepithelial cyst with sebaceous glands of the pancreas: a case report
Published in
Surgical Case Reports, September 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40792-016-0228-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hiromitsu Maehira, Hisanori Shiomi, Koichiro Murakami, Hiroya Akabori, Shigeyuki Naka, Mitsuaki Ishida, Masaji Tani

Abstract

Lymphoepithelial cyst (LEC) of the pancreas is a rare benign tumor. LEC with sebaceous glands of the pancreas is extremely rare, and its histogenesis remains unclear. We present a 66-year-old man with an incidental finding of a cystic lesion at the neck of the pancreas. Pancreatic juice cytology results and elevated serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 and Dupan-2 levels indicated that the cyst was a potential adenocarcinoma. Therefore, a pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed. Macroscopically, the tumor was a unilocular cyst with a thin transparent wall, filled with soft yellow material. Pathological findings showed that the cyst was lined with squamous epithelium, accompanied by dense lymphoid tissue with scattered germinal centers. There were no hair follicles, but sebaceous glands were present in the lymphoid tissue just beneath the squamous epithelium. Therefore, the histopathological diagnosis was an LEC with sebaceous glands of the pancreas. Furthermore, the squamous epithelium surrounding the cyst was pathologically continuous with the tubular structure, indicating that the tubular structure transitioned into the squamous epithelium. We report an extremely rare case of LEC with sebaceous glands of the pancreas. Moreover, the pathological findings, which showed that the tubular structure transitioned into the squamous epithelium, suggested that this was squamous metaplasia. In order to investigate the histogenesis of LEC of the pancreas, the pathological findings must be evaluated.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 33%
Student > Master 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 67%
Unknown 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2016.
All research outputs
#20,341,859
of 22,888,307 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Case Reports
#239
of 488 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#278,673
of 321,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Case Reports
#7
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,888,307 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 488 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,166 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.