| Title |
Patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events and quality-of-life linear analogue self-assessment in breast cancer patients receiving radiation therapy: single-institution prospective registry
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41687-021-00408-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
C. S. Thorpe, T. A. DeWees, M. A. Golafshar, R. S. Bhangoo, T. Z. Vern-Gross, L. A. McGee, W. W. Wong, M. Y. Halyard, S. R. Keole, C. E. Vargas |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 64% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 7% |
| Decision Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 64% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2022.
All research outputs
#19,402,144
of 23,870,022 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#417
of 553 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#374,851
of 506,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#23
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,870,022 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 553 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 506,328 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.