↓ Skip to main content

Are suspicious activity reporting requirements for cryptocurrency exchanges effective?

Overview of attention for article published in Financial Innovation, October 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Are suspicious activity reporting requirements for cryptocurrency exchanges effective?
Published in
Financial Innovation, October 2021
DOI 10.1186/s40854-021-00294-6
Authors

Daehan Kim, Mehmet Huseyin Bilgin, Doojin Ryu

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 4 13%
Student > Master 4 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 17 53%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 19%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 9%
Arts and Humanities 2 6%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 17 53%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2022.
All research outputs
#14,471,764
of 21,538,985 outputs
Outputs from Financial Innovation
#76
of 137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#271,857
of 468,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Financial Innovation
#18
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,538,985 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 468,246 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.