↓ Skip to main content

Esophageal and transpulmonary pressure in the clinical setting: meaning, usefulness and perspectives

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
124 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
370 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
558 Mendeley
Title
Esophageal and transpulmonary pressure in the clinical setting: meaning, usefulness and perspectives
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, June 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00134-016-4400-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tommaso Mauri, Takeshi Yoshida, Giacomo Bellani, Ewan C. Goligher, Guillaume Carteaux, Nuttapol Rittayamai, Francesco Mojoli, Davide Chiumello, Lise Piquilloud, Salvatore Grasso, Amal Jubran, Franco Laghi, Sheldon Magder, Antonio Pesenti, Stephen Loring, Luciano Gattinoni, Daniel Talmor, Lluis Blanch, Marcelo Amato, Lu Chen, Laurent Brochard, Jordi Mancebo

Abstract

Esophageal pressure (Pes) is a minimally invasive advanced respiratory monitoring method with the potential to guide management of ventilation support and enhance specific diagnoses in acute respiratory failure patients. To date, the use of Pes in the clinical setting is limited, and it is often seen as a research tool only. This is a review of the relevant technical, physiological and clinical details that support the clinical utility of Pes. After appropriately positioning of the esophageal balloon, Pes monitoring allows titration of controlled and assisted mechanical ventilation to achieve personalized protective settings and the desired level of patient effort from the acute phase through to weaning. Moreover, Pes monitoring permits accurate measurement of transmural vascular pressure and intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure and facilitates detection of patient-ventilator asynchrony, thereby supporting specific diagnoses and interventions. Finally, some Pes-derived measures may also be obtained by monitoring electrical activity of the diaphragm. Pes monitoring provides unique bedside measures for a better understanding of the pathophysiology of acute respiratory failure patients. Including Pes monitoring in the intensivist's clinical armamentarium may enhance treatment to improve clinical outcomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 124 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 558 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 551 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 82 15%
Researcher 78 14%
Student > Postgraduate 56 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 7%
Student > Master 37 7%
Other 126 23%
Unknown 142 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 326 58%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 4%
Engineering 18 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 <1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 <1%
Other 23 4%
Unknown 159 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 83. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2023.
All research outputs
#517,470
of 25,534,033 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#473
of 5,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,323
of 368,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#2
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,534,033 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,434 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,946 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.