↓ Skip to main content

Issues Concerning Survival of Viruses on Surfaces

Overview of attention for article published in Food and Environmental Virology, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#8 of 147)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Issues Concerning Survival of Viruses on Surfaces
Published in
Food and Environmental Virology, February 2010
DOI 10.1007/s12560-010-9025-6
Authors

P. Vasickova, I. Pavlik, M. Verani, A. Carducci

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 6%
Norway 1 3%
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 29 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 27%
Researcher 8 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 15%
Professor 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Other 5 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 24%
Environmental Science 7 21%
Engineering 7 21%
Unspecified 5 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 9%
Other 3 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2013.
All research outputs
#1,339,586
of 12,614,142 outputs
Outputs from Food and Environmental Virology
#8
of 147 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,629
of 247,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Food and Environmental Virology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,614,142 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 147 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,707 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them