↓ Skip to main content

Chaotic genetic patchiness in an intertidal limpet, Siphonaria sp.

Overview of attention for article published in Marine Biology, January 1982
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
192 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
Chaotic genetic patchiness in an intertidal limpet, Siphonaria sp.
Published in
Marine Biology, January 1982
DOI 10.1007/bf00397680
Authors

M. S. Johnson, R. Black

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 3 4%
United States 1 1%
New Zealand 1 1%
Unknown 65 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 30%
Student > Master 9 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 10 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 73%
Environmental Science 10 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Unspecified 3 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 1 1%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2016.
All research outputs
#1,838,568
of 12,226,093 outputs
Outputs from Marine Biology
#338
of 2,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,553
of 261,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine Biology
#12
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,226,093 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,013 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,167 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.