↓ Skip to main content

Letter transpositions within and across morphemic boundaries: Is there a cross-language difference?

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Letter transpositions within and across morphemic boundaries: Is there a cross-language difference?
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, March 2013
DOI 10.3758/s13423-013-0425-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claudia Sánchez-Gutiérrez, Kathleen Rastle

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Unknown 22 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 39%
Unspecified 3 13%
Student > Postgraduate 2 9%
Student > Master 2 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 9%
Other 5 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 10 43%
Linguistics 8 35%
Unspecified 3 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Neuroscience 1 4%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2016.
All research outputs
#4,466,975
of 8,372,629 outputs
Outputs from Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
#824
of 1,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,859
of 252,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
#29
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,372,629 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,375 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,191 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.