| Title |
Putting indigenous conservation policy into practice delivers biodiversity and cultural benefits
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, September 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-016-1207-6 |
| Authors |
Emilie Ens, Mitchell. L. Scott, Yugul Mangi Rangers, Craig Moritz, Rebecca Pirzl |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Australia | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 247 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 245 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 47 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 12% |
| Researcher | 28 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 7% |
| Other | 38 | 15% |
| Unknown | 54 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 64 | 26% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 50 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 34 | 14% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 9 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 7% |
| Unknown | 67 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2020.
All research outputs
#2,002,917
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#280
of 2,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,557
of 335,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#6
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,647 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,934 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.