RT @GigaScience: Probably now 1,000 journals down and 19,000 to go, as open peer review becomes the norm. We’ve been mandating it since 201…
RT @GigaScience: Probably now 1,000 journals down and 19,000 to go, as open peer review becomes the norm. We’ve been mandating it since 201…
Probably now 1,000 journals down and 19,000 to go, as open peer review becomes the norm. We’ve been mandating it since 2012 https://t.co/8erTBIAElm
RT @GigaScience: On the second day of #PeerReviewWeek21, our EiC explains more on how GigaScience handles the complex issue of identity in…
On the second day of #PeerReviewWeek21, our EiC explains more on how GigaScience handles the complex issue of identity in peer review. And you can read more in our Editorial on the topic here https://t.co/8erTBIAElm https://t.co/Ivx6H9oPvz
@thegrandlocus @marc_rr @NAR_Open @BMC_series @Publons Only drawbacks noticed have been slightly longer time to get reviews in, and need to invite 5-10% more reviewers (data from BMC). That is the main issue of scalability, and we’ve been willing to take t
You can see more in our 2013 Editorial https://t.co/8erTBIAElm, and as all our peer reviews are CC-BY they are also mirrored and archived in @publons https://t.co/uhC3kffUkp
RT @realscientists: IMO: need to improve transparency in Research – we chose to adopt fully open peer review. Read more on why here: https:…
@GigaScience takes it one-step further by adding reviews n giving credit to authors in Publons–that hvecitable DOIs https://t.co/dXK4ENOt2e
IMO: need to improve transparency in Research – we chose to adopt fully open peer review. Read more on why here: https://t.co/ahA8VgHnjH
RT @GigaScience: We've been saying that since we launched in 2012 (see https://t.co/h8rywNs3VE), and been normal in medicine since the late…
RT @GigaScience: We've been saying that since we launched in 2012 (see https://t.co/h8rywNs3VE), and been normal in medicine since the late…
RT @GigaScience: We've been saying that since we launched in 2012 (see https://t.co/h8rywNs3VE), and been normal in medicine since the late…
We've been saying that since we launched in 2012 (see https://t.co/h8rywNs3VE), and been normal in medicine since the late-90's (BMJ/BMC) https://t.co/f3CtEqUHbw
Peering into peer-review at @GigaScience https://t.co/Qg9xKyP9Yd
.@BMC_series for our thoughts on peer review listen to @Medi_Cole in the Auckland #BMCRoadshow & see our editorial http://t.co/6Ag0rpERg3 &
Want more on Open Peer Review see http://t.co/ZiIWY6J6Ra http://t.co/i9IyXwAgbq & on Extra-Open Peer Review http://t.co/06vQzX5x3d #CSE2014
Want more on Open Peer Review see http://t.co/ZiIWY6J6Ra http://t.co/i9IyXwAgbq & on Extra-Open Peer Review http://t.co/06vQzX5x3d #CSE2014
Want more on Open Peer Review see http://t.co/ZiIWY6J6Ra http://t.co/i9IyXwAgbq & on Extra-Open Peer Review http://t.co/06vQzX5x3d #CSE2014
Want more on Open Peer Review see http://t.co/ZiIWY6J6Ra http://t.co/i9IyXwAgbq & on Extra-Open Peer Review http://t.co/06vQzX5x3d #CSE2014
Want more on Open Peer Review see http://t.co/ZiIWY6J6Ra http://t.co/i9IyXwAgbq & on Extra-Open Peer Review http://t.co/06vQzX5x3d #CSE2014
Want more on Open Peer Review see http://t.co/ZiIWY6J6Ra http://t.co/i9IyXwAgbq & on Extra-Open Peer Review http://t.co/06vQzX5x3d #CSE2014
Want more on Open Peer Review see http://t.co/ZiIWY6J6Ra http://t.co/i9IyXwAgbq & on Extra-Open Peer Review http://t.co/06vQzX5x3d #CSE2014
Want more on Open Peer Review see http://t.co/ZiIWY6J6Ra http://t.co/i9IyXwAgbq & on Extra-Open Peer Review http://t.co/06vQzX5x3d #CSE2014
Want more on Open Peer Review see http://t.co/ZiIWY6J6Ra http://t.co/i9IyXwAgbq & on Extra-Open Peer Review http://t.co/06vQzX5x3d #CSE2014
Want more on Open Peer Review see http://t.co/ZiIWY6J6Ra http://t.co/i9IyXwAgbq & on Extra-Open Peer Review http://t.co/06vQzX5x3d #CSE2014
Want more on Open Peer Review see http://t.co/ZiIWY6J6Ra http://t.co/i9IyXwAgbq & on Extra-Open Peer Review http://t.co/06vQzX5x3d #CSE2014
Want more on Open Peer Review see http://t.co/ZiIWY6J6Ra http://t.co/i9IyXwAgbq & on Extra-Open Peer Review http://t.co/06vQzX5x3d #CSE2014
Want more on Open Peer Review see http://t.co/ZiIWY6J6Ra http://t.co/i9IyXwAgbq & on Extra-Open Peer Review http://t.co/06vQzX5x3d #CSE2014
Want more on Open Peer Review see http://t.co/ZiIWY6J6Ra http://t.co/i9IyXwAgbq & on Extra-Open Peer Review http://t.co/06vQzX5x3d #CSE2014
@trished @SciPubLab @scholarlykitchn yes, >35000 BMC articles have been published with open peer review (inc ours http://t.co/LNGONV4XWz)
Looking forward to following #solo13peer online, as we use open #peerreview http://t.co/LNGONV4XWz Interesting new data from BMC on topic
Looking forward to following #solo13peer online, as we use open #peerreview http://t.co/LNGONV4XWz Interesting new data from BMC on topic
@BMC_series @cjmoneill @RNajmanovich thx! For more see http://t.co/LNGONV4XWz & our experiments in meta #peerreview http://t.co/LNGONV4XWz
@cjmoneill @RNajmanovich @BMC_series @BioMedCentral Also, @GigaScience is a biology journal with open #peerreview http://t.co/hXL1yH8K9m
@BMC_series @cjmoneill @RNajmanovich thx! For more see http://t.co/LNGONV4XWz & our experiments in meta #peerreview http://t.co/LNGONV4XWz
@cjmoneill @RNajmanovich @BMC_series @BioMedCentral Also, @GigaScience is a biology journal with open #peerreview http://t.co/hXL1yH8K9m
.@openscience @dmsci shame about the 60% who didn't go for open #peerreview. 100% open isn't difficult http://t.co/LNGONV4XWz #SciTechLA
.@openscience @dmsci shame about the 60% who didn't go for open #peerreview. 100% open isn't difficult http://t.co/LNGONV4XWz #SciTechLA
.@openscience @dmsci shame about the 60% who didn't go for open #peerreview. 100% open isn't difficult http://t.co/LNGONV4XWz #SciTechLA
.@openscience @dmsci shame about the 60% who didn't go for open #peerreview. 100% open isn't difficult http://t.co/LNGONV4XWz #SciTechLA
For! http://t.co/LNGONV4XWz MT @TandFEditors Peer review goes meta @irenehames at #EASE_ISMTE. Are you for/against open #peerreview?
Peering into peer-review at GigaScience or more open peer review, please! http://t.co/7cNijv7sjD
Two interesting discussions of open science: http://t.co/OnC7K0cD7f http://t.co/UJZhtGdiv1 HT: @GigaScience
@DrStelling @MMMarksman @ethanwhite @PubPeer @nucAmbiguous @openscience @jasonpriem see also our take on this http://t.co/LNGONV4XWz
@simon_andrews @BorisAdryan @aylwyn_scally BMC has tried open review: http://t.co/3cz0NuOZYz; http://t.co/Pg6LWzBKT5; http://t.co/6EOLek6Kyp
@simon_andrews @BorisAdryan @aylwyn_scally BMC has tried open review: http://t.co/3cz0NuOZYz; http://t.co/Pg6LWzBKT5; http://t.co/6EOLek6Kyp
@BioMickWatson @Alexis_Verger @thePeerJ @FrontiersIn yup, thanks for the HT! This is why we use open peer-review: http://t.co/nS6UEHFi
Peering into peer-review at GigaScience http://t.co/W8eePk6j
Peering into peer-review at GigaScience http://t.co/W8eePk6j
@BioMickWatson @Alexis_Verger @thePeerJ @FrontiersIn yup, thanks for the HT! This is why we use open peer-review: http://t.co/nS6UEHFi
@drdrewsteen @aawitney @biomickwatson @gigascience have lots of suggestions http://t.co/F2m4wWTQ
@BioMickWatson @Alexis_Verger @thePeerJ @FrontiersIn yup, thanks for the HT! This is why we use open peer-review: http://t.co/nS6UEHFi
#gigascience Peering into peer-review at GigaScience http://t.co/Ic89Z4lF shedding light on science ways and means
No longer shall thee hide behind the cloak of anonymity MT @iainh_z: Peering into (open) #peerreview at @GigaScience http://t.co/BAexZ1Ek
New editorial on open #peerreview @GigaScience Peering into peer-review at GigaScience http://t.co/NlLIttPe
New editorial on open #peerreview @GigaScience Peering into peer-review at GigaScience http://t.co/NlLIttPe
New editorial on open #peerreview @GigaScience Peering into peer-review at GigaScience http://t.co/NlLIttPe
Peering into peer-review at @GigaScience http://t.co/L14BXrQN
New editorial on open #peerreview @GigaScience Peering into peer-review at GigaScience http://t.co/NlLIttPe
New editorial on open #peerreview @GigaScience Peering into peer-review at GigaScience http://t.co/NlLIttPe
Scott Edmunds provides an example of how GigaScience's open peer review promotes and enables reproducibility: http://t.co/HtxAue5N