↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of superior cavo-pulmonary anastomoses (Glenn shunt) by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in comparison with multi-slice computed tomography

Overview of attention for article published in Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, December 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
Title
Assessment of superior cavo-pulmonary anastomoses (Glenn shunt) by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in comparison with multi-slice computed tomography
Published in
Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, December 2021
DOI 10.1186/s43055-021-00676-x
Authors

Marwa Ali Gamal El-Deen, Ahmed Samir Ibrahim, Emad H. Abdeldayem, Remon Zaher Elia, Soha Romeih

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2021.
All research outputs
#14,828,636
of 22,053,184 outputs
Outputs from Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine
#39
of 76 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#252,833
of 437,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine
#16
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,053,184 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 76 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.