↓ Skip to main content

Characterization of Haku Maki prints from the “Poem” series using light-based techniques

Overview of attention for article published in Heritage Science, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Characterization of Haku Maki prints from the “Poem” series using light-based techniques
Published in
Heritage Science, August 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40494-016-0096-z
Authors

Lynn Chua, Claire Hoevel, Gregory D. Smith

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 38%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 24%
Professor 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 6 21%
Chemistry 5 17%
Materials Science 4 14%
Physics and Astronomy 3 10%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 10%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 7 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2016.
All research outputs
#15,383,207
of 22,886,568 outputs
Outputs from Heritage Science
#313
of 413 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#217,917
of 341,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Heritage Science
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,886,568 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 413 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,479 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.