↓ Skip to main content

Overview of the Genetics of Major Depressive Disorder

Overview of attention for article published in Current Psychiatry Reports, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 1,289)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
81 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
21 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
3 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
338 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
796 Mendeley
Title
Overview of the Genetics of Major Depressive Disorder
Published in
Current Psychiatry Reports, September 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11920-010-0150-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Falk W. Lohoff

Abstract

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a common psychiatric illness with high levels of morbidity and mortality. Despite intensive research during the past several decades, the neurobiological basis and pathophysiology of depressive disorders remain unknown. Genetic factors play important roles in the development of MDD, as indicated by family, twin, and adoption studies, and may reveal important information about disease mechanisms. This article describes recent developments in the field of psychiatric genetics, with a focus on MDD. Early twin studies, linkage studies, and association studies are discussed. Recent findings from genome-wide association studies are reviewed and future directions discussed. Despite all efforts, thus far, no single genetic variation has been identified to increase the risk of depression substantially. Genetic variants are expected to have only small effects on overall disease risk, and multiple genetic factors in conjunction with environmental factors are likely necessary for the development of MDD. Future large-scale studies are needed to dissect this complex phenotype and to identify pathways involved in the etiology of MDD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 796 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 781 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 170 21%
Student > Master 138 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 98 12%
Researcher 52 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 47 6%
Other 109 14%
Unknown 182 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 131 16%
Psychology 109 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 82 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 80 10%
Neuroscience 72 9%
Other 114 14%
Unknown 208 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 674. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2024.
All research outputs
#32,232
of 25,878,862 outputs
Outputs from Current Psychiatry Reports
#3
of 1,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42
of 108,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Psychiatry Reports
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,878,862 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,289 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,839 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them