↓ Skip to main content

In memoriam Ching-I Peng (1950–2018)—an outstanding scientist and mentor with a remarkable legacy

Overview of attention for article published in Botanical Studies, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
In memoriam Ching-I Peng (1950–2018)—an outstanding scientist and mentor with a remarkable legacy
Published in
Botanical Studies, April 2020
DOI 10.1186/s40529-020-00291-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kuo-Fang Chung

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 40%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 20%
Psychology 1 20%
Engineering 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2022.
All research outputs
#14,771,404
of 21,973,852 outputs
Outputs from Botanical Studies
#69
of 162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#287,062
of 494,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Botanical Studies
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,973,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 162 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 494,096 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.