↓ Skip to main content

Measuring the bias of incorrect application of feature selection when using cross-validation in radiomics

Overview of attention for article published in Insights into Imaging, November 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Measuring the bias of incorrect application of feature selection when using cross-validation in radiomics
Published in
Insights into Imaging, November 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13244-021-01115-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aydin Demircioğlu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 22%
Student > Master 3 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Researcher 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 17 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 24%
Computer Science 4 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 20 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2023.
All research outputs
#14,594,271
of 24,887,826 outputs
Outputs from Insights into Imaging
#587
of 1,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,937
of 514,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insights into Imaging
#25
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,887,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,143 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 514,933 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.