↓ Skip to main content

The differential for chest pain: when the most common cause is not the answer-a case of de novo esophageal bezoar

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Case Reports, November 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
The differential for chest pain: when the most common cause is not the answer-a case of de novo esophageal bezoar
Published in
Surgical Case Reports, November 2021
DOI 10.1186/s40792-021-01311-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kevin Climaco, Daniel Roubik, Robert Gorrell

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unknown 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2021.
All research outputs
#16,373,075
of 20,362,325 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Case Reports
#103
of 380 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#302,702
of 428,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Case Reports
#22
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,362,325 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 380 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,119 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.